Show Reference: "Is prior knowledge of object geometry used in visually guided reaching?"

Is prior knowledge of object geometry used in visually guided reaching? Journal of Vision, Vol. 5, No. 6. (2005), pp. 504-514, doi:10:1167/5.6.2 by Bruce Hartung, Paul R. Schrater, Heinrich H. B├╝lthoff, Daniel Kersten, Volker H. Franz
@article{hartung-et-al-2005,
    abstract = {We investigated whether humans use prior knowledge of the geometry of faces in visually guided reaching. When viewing the inside of a mask of a face, the mask is often perceived as being a normal (convex) face, instead of the veridical, hollow (concave) shape. In this "hollow-face illusion," prior knowledge of the shape of faces dominates perception, even when in conflict with information from binocular disparity. Computer images of normal and hollow faces were presented, such that depth information from binocular disparity was consistent or in conflict with prior knowledge of the geometry. Participants reached to touch either the nose or cheek of the faces or gave verbal estimates of the corresponding distances. We found that reaching to touch was dominated by prior knowledge of face geometry. However, hollow faces were estimated to be flatter than normal faces. This suggests that the visual system combines binocular disparity and prior assumptions, rather than completely discounting one or the other. When comparing the magnitude of the hollow-face illusion in reaching and verbal tasks, we found that the flattening effect of the illusion was similar for verbal and reaching tasks.},
    author = {Hartung, Bruce and Schrater, Paul R. and B\"{u}lthoff, Heinrich H. and Kersten, Daniel and Franz, Volker H.},
    doi = {10:1167/5.6.2},
    issn = {1534-7362},
    journal = {Journal of Vision},
    keywords = {biology, grasping, multisensory-integration, reaching},
    number = {6},
    pages = {504--514},
    pmid = {16097863},
    posted-at = {2013-07-09 11:22:46},
    priority = {2},
    title = {Is prior knowledge of object geometry used in visually guided reaching?},
    url = {http://dx.doi.org/10:1167/5.6.2},
    volume = {5},
    year = {2005}
}

See the CiteULike entry for more info, PDF links, BibTex etc.

The study by Hartung et al. shows that (concave) hollow faces are perceived as convex faces, but flatter than they would be if they were concave, indicating that online information is combined with prior information, not discarded.